The Solicitor General responds in Watson v. United States
September 30, 2007
The Office of the Solicitor General has responded in the case of Watson v. United States.
The full text of the response can be found here.
Respondent in Parker v. District of Columbia responds
September 30, 2007
The respondent in Parker v. District of Columbia had filed a response with the Supreme Court.
The full text can be found her here.
Respondent in Planned Parenthood v. Rounds
September 30, 2007
The respondents in Planned Parenthood v. Rounds have filed their response with the Supreme Court.
The full text can be found here.
Respondent in Snyder v. Louisiana responds
September 30, 2007
The respondnets in the case of Snyder v. Louisiana have filed their response brief with the Supreme Court.
The full text can be found here.
Respondent in Al-Marri v. Wright responds
September 30, 2007
The respondent has replied in the case of Wright v. al-Marri.
The full text can be found here.
Medellin v. Texas Respondent Reply Brief
September 30, 2007
The respondent has replied in the case of Medellin v. Texas.
The full text can be found here.
Lawyers respond in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board
September 27, 2007
Alyssa Nugent representing the Marion County Election board has flied her response to the petitioners request for cert in the case of Crawford v. Marion County Election Board.
The full text can be found here.
Lawyers reply in New York Board of Elections v. Torres
September 27, 2007
Alex DiGregorio lawyer for the respondent in the case of New York Board of Elections v. Torres has filed a response to the petitioners petition for certiorari. He addresses the three questions presented by the petitiner.
The full text of the response can be found here.
The 316 Episode 1
September 26, 2007
Zack Glick
The 316 has recorded its first episode it can be found here.
If you would like to appear on the show please e-mail Zack Glick thru Blackboard, we record on Friday around 3 PM.
Respondent in Al-Marri v. Wright Wants Lower Court Decision Reaffirmed
September 26, 2007
By Lottie Watts
It is important for the Supreme Court to reaffirm the lower court decision regarding limitations on labeling people as enemy combatants, said Sarah Brigham, who is representing Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri as the respondent in Al-Marri v. Wright.
According to Brigham, the Supreme Court should hear the case and decide in a way that would prevent overextension of the authority of the United States commander-in-chief.
”The fundamentals of the case are the overextension of presidential power,” said Brigham.
The case is about labeling people as enemy combatants and if powers should be authorized to do this.
”I think Mr. Al-Marri’s treatment by the US military and president is an outrage,” said Brigham.
