Matt Reilly Attorney for the Respondent

 

Look at the Numbers: D.C. in Worse Shape After Enacting Ban

The District of Columbia believes that the city’s ban on handguns has reduced crime in the city. Yet, University of Maryland – College Park senior research scientist John R. Lott Jr. demonstrates the ludicrous nature of this line of thought. Here are a few of the most telling statistics from a piece he published in The Washington Times on September 7. He writes;

Read the rest of this entry »

Zach Wallack Petitioner

District of Columbia Urges Supreme Court to Hear Case

When the District of Columbia Circuit Court struck down a longstanding District of Columbia handgun control law, the lives of the citizens in the District were immediately put at greater risk.

The Circuit Court has committed a number of errors in their ruling, including disregarding previous Supreme Court precedent as outlined in United States v. Miller, a case decided in 1939. Petitioner for the District of Columbia, Zachary Wallack, states “Any time a rogue lower court goes directly against the rulings of the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court must step in and right the wrong in the case of District of Columbia v. Parker”.

Read the rest of this entry »

 The respondent in Parker v. District of Columbia had filed a response with the Supreme Court.

The full text can be found her here.

Zach Wallack the petitioner in the case of District of Columbia v. Parker has filed a writ of certiorari, hoping the case will decide to hear his clients case in this term.

The full text of the petition can be found here.

Parker v. District of Columbia

September 14, 2007

–Zack Glick–

Parker v. District of Columbia is a case concerning the Constitutionality of D.C. gun control laws. The representatives are as follows: the petitioner for The District of Columbia is Zachary Wallach , and representing the respondent Shelly Parker is Matt Reilly.